Some people think that we should protect wild animals with no exception of reasons when they are in danger. Others believe that we should let nature determine the fate of wild animals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Wildlife conservation seems to be the topic of the hour in the 21st century. Some people view protection of wild animals by individuals as a must without any exceptions, while others believe that only natural forces should be allowed to govern wildlife. I agree with the former view many wild animals need protection due to human activities and their protection leads to conservation of the planet.

On the one hand, conserving wildlife is exceptionally important as wild animals constitute a vital part of the natural order of the planet and without them life would cease to exist. It is due to various human activities such as excessive deforestation and hunting that many wild species are extinct or endangered, resulting in the need for action by humans. For example, large-scale poaching has resulted in endangering tigers without whom the natural food chain would be disrupted leading to severe ecological imbalance. As a result, many actions are needed for protecting tiger populations from disappearing if environmental stability and sustainability of life is to be maintained. 

On the other hand, the other belief prescribes that nature should determine the fate of wild animals because too many steps to protect wild animals may result in interference with natural balance and severe consequences. For instance, in Brazil, conservationists built preservation farms for the red-back crabs which led to a sudden peak in their population. This increase in aquatic predators caused a huge decline in the number of fishes in Brazilian waters and affected the livelihood of many fishermen and created several problems for the conservationists. 

In conclusion, although nature should be the primary force in deciding the fate of wild animals, human intervention for preserving wildlife is critical for maintenance of life on earth as it is due to human activities that much of the wildlife is endangered. 

这道写作考题

并不算是特别‘热门’的

所以靠谱的高分范文

就真的是非常有价值了

学一下相关话题的

高分词汇和表达

妥妥的有用！

• Conservation

n. (动植物，森林等的) 保护

e.g.: One method of soil conservation is the use of windbreaks.

• Of the hour

目前的，紧急的，此刻最要紧的

e.g.: The need of the hour, especially in developing countries, is to develop new materials to efficiently produce clean drinking water.

• Natural forces

自然力量

e.g.: Surfers know something about how to take advantage of natural forces which translates well to portfolio management.

• Govern

Vt. 管理，支配，统治

e.g.: The party had been governing for seven months.

• Exceptionally

adv. 异常地，特殊地，极其，非常

e.g.: Though nearly 50, he is exceptionally vigorous in work.

• Constitute

Vt. 组成，构成，被视为，被算作

e.g.: The rise in crime constitutes a threat to society.

• Cease to

停止，终止

e.g.: Otherwise we would all become like you , and civilization would cease to function smoothly and productively.

• Deforestation

n. 采伐森林，砍伐森林，对应反义词：reforestation

e.g.: Deforestation can also change soil dynamics and increase erosion, both of which can release more carbon into the atmosphere.

• Large-scale poaching

Large-scale: adj. 大规模的，大范围的

e.g.: What we need is to make large-scale mechanized food production less carbon-intensive and more sustainable.

Poaching: n. 非法狩猎

e.g.: In the late 1970s aggressive poaching took the rhino to the brink of extinction.

• Ecological imbalance

生态失衡，生态失调

e.g.: It has great practical significance in solving such problems as environmental pollution and ecological imbalance caused by industrialization and unrestrained conquest of nature.

• Interference with

干涉，妨碍，打扰

e.g.: This will help ensure that there is no undue interference with existing spectrum users.

• Predator

n. 捕食者，食肉动物，掠夺者

e.g.: Sharks are the top predator in the ocean and are vital to its ecosystem.

• Livelihood

n. 可能性，可能

e.g.: Using a seatbelt will reduce the likelihood of serious in