我们今天来讨论SWT答题中两个比较常见的分歧。
首先，对于SWT这道题，同学们在做题流程上会有不同的处理方法。
1.有人会先读一遍整篇文章或者整个段落，再用自己的话复述；
2.另一些人可能先把文章片段截取出来，再运用一些连接词把片段拼凑起来。
使用第一种先通读文章的方法，首先要求我们必须能看懂，如果对全文一知半解，用自己的话总结出来是很困难的。我们知道SWT的文章大多是偏难的，理解起来会花费一些时间，所以使用这种方法比较考验我们的快速阅读能力。其次，这种方法比较容易遗漏信息点，因为一些重点内容也会隐藏在段落中，只是通篇去读真的不太容易找到。当然这种方法也是有优点的，当理解内容后，自己说出的话比较好组织语言，在写作方面能够节约时间，并且有利于提高语法的正确率。
使用第二种截取片段法，会遇到一个挑战，就是要纠结于去截取哪些地方，这对精读能力是个考验，我们需要有排除非重点的能力。如果内容截多了，我们会发现自己可能抄下来一大段话，但为了保证最终答案在75个字以内还是需要去做削减。这时候无非是在给自己制造麻烦。其次，这种方法对自己的语法基础是个不小的考验，因为我们需要做到在保证语法都正确的情况下，把好几个短语或句子拼凑成一个长句。
以上两种方法的优缺点总结出来就是，先通读文章的做法会让我们在组织语言上比较自然，有利于语法的正确率，并且提高我们的答题速度；截取片断法可以帮助我们能抓住更多的内容和词汇分，但考验我们的做题效率。
另一个分歧出现在写作的字数上。
根据SWT打分细则里对form的要求，只要字数在5-75个字以内就能拿到这项分数。
1.有的同学答案写的尽量精简利于我们保证语法结构的正确。
2.也有很多同学怀着拿高分的目的去尽量多写字。
的确，写的字数更多，意味着覆盖到所有信息点的概率越大，但真的是字数越多越容易多拿内容分吗？这也不一定，因为很多题目中真正得分的信息点其实并不多，写的多也容易错，并不一定能帮助我们高效拿分。
接下来我们尝试两种方法来解决以下这道考试高频题：
When Australians engage in debate about educational quality or equity, they often seem to accept that a country cannot achieve both atthe same time.
Curriculum reforms intended to improve equity often fail to do so because they increase breadth or differentiation in offerings in a way that increases differences inquality. Further, these differences in quality often reflect differences in students’ social backgrounds because the ‘new’ offerings are typically taken up by relatively disadvantaged students who are not served well them.Evidence from New South Wales will be used to illustrate this point.
The need to improve the quality of education is well accepted across OECD and other countries as they seek to strengthen their human capital to underpin their modern, knowledge economies. Improved equity is also important for this purpose,since the demand for high level skills is wide spread and the opportunities forthe low skilled are diminishing.
Improved equity in education is also important for social cohesion. There are countries in which the education system seems primarily to reproduce existing social arrangements, conferring privilege where it already exists and denying it where it does not. Even in countries where the diagnosis might be less extreme, the capacity of schoolng to build social cohesion is often diminished by the way in which schools separate individuals and groups.
方法一，自己总结语言
Normally, acountry cannot improve the quality and the equity of education at the sametime, which can be seen as the solution to strengthen human capital and improvesocial cohesion, because any attempts to improve the equity of education oftencreate variation in the quality delivered.（47 words）
方法二，截取信息点，利用连接词拼凑成长句
In order tostrengthen human capital, the quality and the equity of education are needed tobe improved, but a country often cannot achieve both ofthem at the same time, because curriculum reforms intended to improveequity usually increase differences in quality, which reflects differences instudents’ social backgrounds; moreover, improved equity in education isimportant for social cohesion. (60 words)
那么到底哪种方法得分高呢？
你又适合用那种方法呢？
本周五下午3点到5点
7PLUS墨尔本校区
SWT专题讲座
本周内容
SWT到底是摘原文？
还是自己总结？
是尽可能的提到更多的内容？
还是精简只提重点？
我们给你最权威的答案。。。
地址: Suite 602, 167-169 Queen Street, Melbourne
电话：03 9670 7996
快来联系小七报名吧！
