编者的话：这是不是明目张胆害人？ 有多少人被害？ 有没有人被处罚？ 难道如此害人形为就停止了吗？如果没人受处罚也没停止，这还是我们追求的民主国家吗？
watch you tube video at：
录像: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBCyKLq-M0c
卡尔加里医疗病人Keith Gall 的胜利:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBCyKLq-M0c
你可能还记得Keith Gall的故事。
Keith是卡尔加里的一名多发性硬化症患者，拥有联邦执照，可以种植自己的大麻，并于2015年9月由一个绿色团队检查了他的家。
在检查之后，艾伯塔省卫生服务局（AHS）向他发出了一份命令，要求根据“公共卫生法”进行的价值大约30,000美元的检测和补救措施，理由是“怀疑霉菌”。
与卡尔加里至少27家其他许可的种植户不同，这些依赖药用植物的病人和残疾人种植户没有对他们的房子被无端关闭（相当于中国的强拆）提供出抗议（选择认栽），而Keith Gall站到了其他人的对面对该决定提出上诉。
由于他选择抗争，Gall已经从其固定收入花费了相当数量的法律费用。无论目前的裁决如何，一位AHS律师威胁他AHS会继续采取法律行动。他是一场暴力的入室侵袭受害者之一，他和他的室友被殴打，绑架和堵嘴。
截至4月8日星期五，Keith Gall收到了可喜的消息 - 他赢了！
The judicial tribunal 认定：
1。Keith的住所是一个私人住宅，而不是AHS所称的公共场所，因此他们需要同意方可进入。
2。未经同意AHS就进入Gall的住宅。
3。在该处住宅发现的条件并不支持AHS发布的命令（涉嫌假信息）
从这起案件中可以吸取很多教训，这在很多方面开创了保护加拿大公民自由的途径。
第一课是国家不关心你。如果你在它的议程，你就像一只蟑螂一样被捏死。
在这种情况下，有一个明确的议程，正如Nenshi市长写给当时的卫生部长罗纳·安布罗斯的一封信所证明的那样，这封信将关闭卡尔加里的所有合法grow ops。
AHS律师在国家给予的无休止的权力和资源的支持下，威胁对一个只有固定收入的非常严重的残疾人继续采取法律行动，应该告诉你一切，你需要知道谁是国家服务对象。
第二课是了解你的权利。除非法律强制要求，否则你一定不必要接受任何国家演员的检查，并主动和律师了解计划国家来敲门的日子。请注意，代表绿色团队的不同机构是根据不同的立法和管辖权限进行运作。
第三个教训是，根据你的住所，你所享有的权利似乎有所不同（至少在阿尔伯塔省）。例如，出租物业被视为阿尔伯塔省的公共场所，因此根据“公共卫生法案”，公共机构可以给予公共当局更多的管辖权。
第四个教训是，如果你是一个有良心的种植者，那么这个国家只有很小的绳索牵着你。
Gall通过他的运作证明他对安全感很认真，因此，司法法庭发现，即使他们同意进入住所，也没有发Order的依据。
这里的教训是在施工阶段遵循规范，获得适当的许可证，友好的对待检查员，并且当你遇到新的领域时，请咨询该领域的专家。
第五课是不要roll over。
大麻社区聚集在一起帮助Keith，结果保护了他的自由，并使其他种植者更容易争取他们的权利。
在Gall没有为自己的权利而斗争之前，卡尔加里至少有27位获得许可的种植者，并且州政府对他们进行了翻查，然后将这种压制用作公共问题的证据。
一个勇敢的残疾男人足以站起来面对欺凌，殴打（字面意思），发现一群支持者在他身后，击败了玩游戏的人，帮助加拿大人获得更多自由。
Keith目前正在决定是否起诉当局明显滥用公职。
你怎么看？Gall是否应该采取行动，让全国当局认真考虑压制医用大麻种植者？这是你愿意支持的原因吗？
You may remember the story of Keith Gall.
Keith is a multiple sclerosis patient in Calgary with a federal license to grow his own cannabis who had his home inspected by a green team back in September 2015.
Subsequent to the inspection, Alberta Health Services (AHS) issued him an order requiring approximately $30,000 worth of testing and remediation under the Public Health Act citing a “suspicion of mold.”
Unlike at least 27 other licensed grow ops in Calgary which were shut down without protest from the sick and disabled growers relying on those medicinal plants, Keith Gall stood up to The Man and appealed the decision.
As a result of his choice to fight, Keith has spent a considerable amount of his fixed-income on legal fees, he has had an AHS lawyer intimidate him with threats of continued legal action regardless of the current ruling, and he was the victim of a violent home invasion that left him and his roommate beaten, bound and gagged.
As of Friday, Apr. 8, Keith Gall received welcome news — HE WON!
The judicial tribunal found that:
Keith’s dwelling was a private place, not a public place as AHS alleged, and therefore they required consent to enter
Consent was not given to enter the dwelling
The conditions found at the premises did not support the order that was issued
There are many lessons to take away from this case, which in many ways pioneers a pathway to the protection of civil liberties in Canada.
The first lesson is that the state does not care about you. You are a cockroach to be crushed if you get in the way of its agenda.
In this case there was a clear agenda, as evidenced by a letter from Mayor Nenshi to then Health Minister Rona Ambrose, to shut down all legal grow ops in Calgary.
The AHS lawyer, backed by the unending power and resources of the state, threatening continued legal action against a very conscientious disabled man on a fixed income ought to tell you everything you need to know about who the state serves.
The second lesson is to know your rights. Be sure you do not consent needlessly to inspections by any state actor unless compelled to do so by law, it would be good to talk to a lawyer proactively and plan for the day the state comes knocking. Be aware that different agencies represented in a Green Team operate under different legislation and jurisdiction.
The third lesson is that there seems to be a difference (at least in Alberta) in the rights you have depending on your dwelling. For example, a rental property is considered a public place in Alberta and so it gives public authorities more jurisdiction under the Public Health Act than if you own your home.
The fourth lesson is that if you are a conscientious grower you give the state very little rope to hang you with.
Keith demonstrated, by the construction and operation of his grow, that he was conscientious about safety and, as a result, the judicial tribunal found there was no basis for the order even if they had consent to enter the dwelling.
The lesson here is to follow codes, get the proper permits, be friendly and accommodating to inspectors during the construction phase, and, when you are charting new territory, consult an expert in the field.
The fifth lesson is don’t roll over.
The cannabis community came together to help Keith and, as a result, he protected his freedom and made it easier for other growers to fight for their rights.
At least 27 licensed growers in Calgary before Keith did not fight for their rights and the state rolled over them and then used that oppression as evidence of a public problem.
One brave disabled man who’d enough stood up to bullies, took a beating (literally), found out a community of supporters were behind him, beat The Man at his own game and helped Canadians gain more freedom.
Keith is currently deciding whether to sue authorities for their clear abuse of public office.
What do you think? Should Keith pursue action that would make authorities across the country think long and hard about oppressing medical cannabis growers? Is that a cause you’d be willing to get behind?
https://cannabislifenetwork.com/victory-for-calgary-medical-patient-keith-gall/
